“All the skilled artisans among those doing the work made the tabernacle with ten curtains. Bezalel made them of finely spun linen, as well as blue, purple, and scarlet yarn, with a design of cherubim worked into them. . . .They made a medallion, the holy diadem, out of pure gold and wrote on it an inscription like the engraving on a seal: Holy to the Lord. They attached a cord of blue yarn to it in order to mount it on the turban, just as the Lord had commanded Moses.” (CSB – Read chapter 36; chapter 37; chapter 38; chapter 39)
I’ve talked before recently about the fact that my church is in a building process. We’ve been here for a long time. In fact, they have been slowly walking down this path for twice as long as I’ve even been here. Just before Covid hit we at long last thought we were at the point we could start building. But then we couldn’t because of Covid. And for a while we were pretty discouraged. All that work on developing plans and we weren’t going to get to actually build it. And yet, by God’s grace, here we are again: ready to build. Developing plans to build without actually building is pointless. Israel had plans to build. It was finally time to bring it into reality. Let’s talk about how that process unfolded.
Let’s state the obvious at the outset here: This is a really, really long section of text. It’s several times longer than what I usually include. We could walk through each of the sections in these four chapters, one at a time, but given that they are nearly word-for-word repeats of the instruction passages in chapters 25-30, that didn’t make a lot of sense to me. Instead, I’m going to link you back to the instruction sections where we talked about the various parts and pieces then. If you’ll recall, many of those posts included links to a series of three-dimensional artist’s renderings that really help with our visualizing what they might have looked like. After that, I’ll highlight two other things, and that’ll be it for today.
The builders began with the tabernacle itself. We talked about that first back in June here. Next, the artisans built the ark of the covenant. Those instructions can be found in Exodus 25:10-22. We talked about them here. Following in order from Exodus 25, next comes the table, which we talked about here. After that is the lampstand. You’ll find that being built in Exodus 37:17-24, but it is first described in Exodus 25:31-40, which we talked about here.
The next piece the builders tackled was the altar of incense. That requires us to jump forward to Exodus 30 in the instruction sequence. It was mid-August before we got to that. Here’s that link. The beginning of Exodus 38 takes us to the altar of burnt offerings which appeared much earlier in the instruction cycle in Exodus 27. We talked about that almost a month before the altar of incense here. From there, the builders went to the bronze basin, completing the various major pieces to be set in the courtyard. That swings us back over to Exodus 30 in the instruction cycle. Here’s that conversation. The last thing they made before taking an inventory of the supplies they used and moving to the priestly garments was to make the courtyard where everyone could gather. That sends us once again back to chapter 27 and a conversation that happened here.
As I just mentioned, the next thing we find in Exodus 38 is an inventory of the materials that had been used so far. It’s a pretty impressive list. It included almost 2200 lbs. of gold, more than 7500 lbs. of silver (which included one hundred bases for the curtain posts that weighed 75 lbs. apiece. There was actually less total bronze at about 5300 lbs. All told, the tabernacle had to have been a sight to see. It was a feast for the eyes and a treat for the senses. Worshiping the Lord was never intended to be some stiff, stodgy, and sullen affair. It was to be a full-on sensory experience that engaged the whole person, heart, mind, and body.
That’s a lesson many churches today could stand to relearn. The act of worship teaches. When it is done badly, it teaches things that aren’t true. Following Jesus is never boring. But if our worship services are boring, we are teaching people that it is. Actively teaching something about God that isn’t true has a name in the Scriptures: false prophecy. God’s thoughts on that are fairly uniformly negative and generally rather violent to boot. When we worship, while it doesn’t have to be a show, it should be a fully engaging experience in which we seek to create connection points for as many different people as we can.
One author, Gary Thomas, identifies nine different ways that people connect best with God. He argues that each of us have one or two of those that are primary. That means not every single thing we do in worship is going to connect with everyone, but that just means that expanding our worship offerings to create as many connection points as possible is a good and wise and gracious thing to do. It helps us make sure that our worship involves our whole person rather than just one part of us.
Getting back on track, with the physical structure of the tabernacle now completed, the artisans turned their attention to the various priestly garments. This occupies most of Exodus 39. The parallel instruction passages are all in Exodus 28. In Exodus 39 they make the ephod, the breastpiece, the robe, the other garments, and finally the seal the high priest wore on his forehead, attached to the turban. In Exodus 28 the order is mostly the same except that the turban is described instead of strictly the seal, and the “other priestly garments” are mentioned last. Those posts are here (ephod), here (breastpiece), here (robe), here (the other priestly garments), and here (the turban with the seal).
And that’s the building of the tabernacle. The people were ready to worship. Well, they were almost ready to worship. First, God had to give them some instructions for how to do that. Those instructions occupy the next document in the Pentateuch, Leviticus, which we will tackle another time. There’s still a bit more of Exodus we need to finish up tomorrow and part of next week, and then we’re finished. A journey that started all the way back in April of 2023 will be completed. Coming up next, we’ll turn our attention to the Advent season. We’ll start our next journey through a whole book in the new year. I’ve got an idea of where that will take us, but I won’t spoil the surprise just yet.
Two more thoughts here. First, there may or may not be any actual significance to this idea, but the order of the building struck me as noteworthy. This is especially true considering that each section here repeats so much of the instruction cycle, but, as you just saw, puts it in a different order. The builders begin with the central space for worship. Then they construct all of the various elements that were to be used for worship. Next, they build the place where all the people could gather for worship. Finally, they created the tools for leadership.
To put that another way, worship was at the heart of everything they did. Once a space for worship had been created, they could set about bringing more structure and definition to that space. When this worship core was intact, an invitation to corporate worship was extended. The tools for formalized leadership (namely the garments for the priests) came last. Worship comes first. Glorifying God for who He is and what He has done; acknowledging, celebrating, and participating in His character is the foundation for everything else we do and think. If we aren’t doing that, we aren’t doing much else of significance.
The structure to this comes second to the act itself. This is because worshiping God isn’t something that can happen in only one way. We see lots of different expressions of worship throughout the Scriptures. As I mentioned a second ago, there are at least nine different ways that people primarily connect to God through worship. Different cultures around the world worship in different ways. Christianity is far and away the least homogeneous of all the world religions. Anyone who suggests otherwise doesn’t know what they’re talking about. There are a manifold of ways to worship the Lord.
One of the few truly consistent aspects of worship is that it was not designed to be only an individual experience. Worship should be corporate. Worshiping individually is fine, but if that’s the only way you are worshiping, you aren’t doing it right. You are missing out on the fuller expression that God designed you to experience. To put that another way, you can’t worship properly apart from the church. And while this isn’t totally necessary, it is nonetheless good and wise for worship to be directed by an individual or team who work together to lead God’s people in an experience of His presence as a body.
One last thing. Sometimes, following God feels very spiritual like when we are praying or reading the Scriptures or engaging in some other spiritual discipline that doesn’t seem to have a ton of real-world relevance. (Of course, the truth is that all of the spiritual disciplines have a ton of real-world relevance because they prepare us to engage with the world as it actually is rather than merely as we wish it would be, but a fuller exploration of that will have to be for another time.) Other times, though, following God can look intensely practical like building a physical structure to serve as a place for worship. The truth is that following Jesus is really both. It is abstract and concrete at the same time. This is because God isn’t looking to be Lord of only our hearts or only our minds. He is looking to be Lord of our whole lives; every single aspect of us. When we give our all to Him, He gives back even more. He gives us His kingdom that is eternal. Let’s get to following Him faithfully.

“He gives us His kingdom that is eternal.”
Exactly what do you mean by this?
LikeLike
I mean that when we are willing to put our trust in Him as Lord, a trust demonstrated by our willingness to do what He says, He rewards that trust by giving us the right to live in His eternal kingdom. It is a kingdom that is present in part now wherever His rule is recognized and accepted (mostly notably in faithful churches); it is a kingdom that will one day encompass the whole world because all the other kingdoms will be gone.
LikeLike
If you mean to say Heaven then why not just say it?
LikeLike
Because that’s not entirely what I meant. You’re likely thinking in terms of a place people go when they die when you use the word. That’s not what I’m talking about. That’s not the language the New Testament authors use. Jesus consistently talked about God’s kingdom. Honestly, most of the modern conceptions of Heaven don’t find much of any traction in the Scriptures. I’d rather be more specific with my language when I can.
LikeLike
So be more specific.
LikeLike
I chose the specific words that I did on purpose. I was writing (as I typically am) for a primarily Christian audience who would have mostly understood what I meant. This is a devotional blog. If I had been aiming at a different, mostly secular audience, I would have chosen different words.
LikeLike
A quick search on a Christian site asserted the terms Kingdom of God and Kingdom of Heaven as used by the unknown author of gMatthew were clearly meant to be interchangeable.
This suggests a place don’t you think so?
LikeLike
Which Christian site? Yes, those terms are generally thought to be interchangeable. The general consensus among at least believing scholars is that God’s kingdom is understood by New Testament authors to be a spiritual reality now ahead of its being a physical place at some point in the future. This is why, for example, Jesus described His kingdom to Pilate as “not of this world.”
LikeLike
I looked at several. Got questions. Org I think it was.
So are you suggesting then, heaven is not an actual place?
LikeLike
Almost certainly not in the way I suspect you are thinking about it, and not yet in any event.
LikeLike
So how would you describe it /them and how do you know?
LikeLike
Them? We’re talking about a thing, not a person. We don’t know what God’s final kingdom – what you likely have in mind when you use the word “Heaven” – will be like in very much detail except that it will be good beyond all reckoning or imagining. To the extent we can tell, it will be located physically on a renewed and restored earth. All the things that are broken and wrong here will be repaired or removed. The picture John paints in Revelation 21 is rather encouraging: “He will wipe away every year from their eyes. Death will be no more; grief, crying, and pain will be no more, because the previous things have passed away.”
As for how I know, I know because I trust that the Scriptures are accurate and reliable in the propositions their authors put forth.
LikeLike
Them…. as in, both Kingdom of God and Kingdom of Heaven. Both of them.
So, in actual fact you have no real idea what either of these thing are.
Funny thing about Revelation, (aside from it’s anonynimity.. John Who? ) it had a rather chequered history and was originally not considered as part of the Canon and was the very last book to be accepted. It didn’t even pass muster in the Eastern church until the 7th century which is hilarious.
The gospels are neither accurate or reliable. This is a fact and isn’t even a question of debate.
You don’t really want to push that apologetic nonsense once more surely?
LikeLike
Yes, I’m aware of my church history, thank you. What’s your point? As for the rest, debating those points with you always feels a little like arguing with one of my teenagers and about as productive. You are free to insist on whatever truth claims you’d like.
LikeLike
The point re: Revelation is, you quote it as if it had some sort of authority yet the book, like the gospels is anonymous and half your church didn’t accept it until the 7th century. So much for inspired by your god! 😊
Funny thing about teenagers is they regularly ask very pertinant questions, have you noticed? This often results in the parent having no rational answer to offer and being fircex to utter those immortal words: “Because I said so!”
Truth claims?
When it comes to religion whenever I reply or make a comment if I am not asking a question I will usually be stating a fact.
While faith underoins everything you believe I don’t make claims unless they are fully supported with evidence.
LikeLike
That does indeed sound like the position you have carved out for yourself there at the end.
LikeLike
Not sure I understand the meaning of your reply. Could you elaborate.
LikeLike
No. Debating with you about these kinds of things is pointless.
LikeLike
Such points are as valid as if a proponant of YEC were wanting to teach a class of children that dinosaurs and humans once coexisted.
Would you think there was a valid case to be made and if you had the final say would you allow it in the classroom?
LikeLike
If I were the one running the school with the final say, no, I would not include that in the curriculum. But then, I don’t agree with the basic YEC premise on the age of the earth. Do I think that a church running its own school should have the right as a matter of religious liberty to have that as part of their curriculum? Yes, I think religious liberty should extend to that.
LikeLike
So you ARE okay lying to children.
You realise this is a form of child abuse.
LikeLike
Lying and now child abuse. On two different threads now, no less. You’re rushing to the conclusions now. It’s important to have good pacing.
Sarcasm aside, no, I’m okay acknowledging that while I have firm and clear beliefs about certain things, including some that appear to have the backing of scientific evidence, a robust commitment to religious liberty necessarily includes a willingness to allow people with different worldview beliefs (i.e., religious beliefs) than I hold to not only hold, but act publicly on their own beliefs in ways that include actively seeking to share their beliefs with others including (and especially) their own children. The belief that teaching things I don’t agree with is child abuse is a rather odious one that its fundamentally totalitarian in its essence. That is why societies built on the guiding assumptions of secularism have always devolved quickly into tyranny whatever their stated aims might have been.
LikeLike
Your refusal to acknowledge the damage done by indoctrinating children with YEC garbage and the insistance it should be allowed is the epitome of hypocrisy and wilfull ignorance which I suspect is solely to allow you to continue indoctrinating children with your own brand of religious supernaturalism, for which there is ample evidence to show how can be extremely detrimental to children.
LikeLike
I had a bit of a snarky reply to this, but I’ll just direct you to my comment on our other thread instead as this is a rather perfect demonstration of my point there.
LikeLike
Snark as much as you like.
It might even suggest you are applying a little critical thinking.
LikeLike